Rule Against Perpetuity | Section 14 of Transfer of Property


Rule Against Perpetuity is mentioned in Section 14 of Transfer of Property Act, 18882. Section 14 of TPA is closely related to other sections like Section 13, 15,16,17 and 18 of TPA. We recommend you to read the other blogs too. All the sections are explained in details in our website.

Rule Against Perpetuity was created to make limits. This limit is regarding Section 13 of TPA that is transfer for benefits of unborn persons. Basically, Section 14 is a continuation of Section 13 of TPA. Click here to read Section 13 – Transfer to an unborn person.


Before going to the details of the rule against perpetuity, let’s understand what is the meaning of it, what is the rule of perpetuity and why the rule against perpetuity is incorporated in TPA.

Perpetuity means

  • The state or quality of lasting forever
  • Time without any limit
  • Forever or something that is perpetual and never end.

Rule of Perpetuity

Rule of Perpetuity means, a property will be in the name of a particular person or his generation for an indefinite time. Suppose, A is the owner of a property and he makes a rule regarding transfer that the property will be transferred to his son, then their sons son and so on. They will have the right to enjoy the property but not the right to transfer the property. So, this particular property will remain in a particular family for an unlimited time. This is the rule of perpetuity.

From this, the rule against perpetuity came.

Why this Rule Against Perpetuity?

There are many reasons for creation of rule against perpetuity. They are

  1. This section ensures that property doesn’t remain in the same family for unlimited timeline. Without this rule, there won’t be circulation of property in society and will remain in a family. This is harmful for society.
  2. This section also ensures that one can utilize his property for his benefit in true sense – transfer/ sale/ gift etc.
  3. This section helps for industrialization. If someone’s land or property is tied up and no one has capital to invest in that particular property. In this scenario, there will not be any industrialization. Without this rule against perpetuity, there won’t be any scope of industrialization.
  4. This section helps the Government to earn income in the form of property registration. Because whenever a property is transferred, there are registration and other procedures, from where the government gets benefitted.

How Perpetuity May Arise?

Perpetuity may arise in two aspects.

Firstly, By taking away from the transferee his power of alienation. For example, X sells his property to Y with a condition that Y can sell the property only to Z. Here, Z may not buy this property. That’s why this condition is void. Section 10 of Transfer of property talks about it.

Secondly, By creating a succession of partial interest in favour of unborn persons. A transfers his property to B with a condition that it will go to the unborn of B, then the unborn of C, then the unborn of D and so on. Perpetuity has arisen in this case. For this part, Section 14 lays down the time period regarding this issue. From this another important point arises and it is Maximum Timeline.

Maximum Timeline in Rules Against Perpetuity

Regarding maximum timeline, there is a famous case Cadell V Palmer where a property was transferred to 26 persons. From this case, some rules were established. The rules are

  1. Transfer can be any number of living persons
  2. Transfer can be to only one unborn person. This unborn person will get absolute interest and transfer will end here.
  3. Timeline of pregnancy (Period of Gestation) and attaining majority.

Analysis of the Minority Period in Rule Against Perpetuity

In accordance with section 3 of the Majority Act, 1875 every person domiciled in India/Bangladesh has attained majority when he/she have completed his/her age of 18 years and not before. When a minor is under the supervision of the Court of Wards his/her minority ceases at the age of 21 years old and not before.

But In the case, Sundarajan V Natarajan the privy council held that, the term minority in Section 14 to be understood as 18 years and not any other age. Here by other age, the privy council meant legal age i.e. 21 years. So, in conclusion the minority period is max 18 years in Section 14.

Extent of the Rule Against Perpetuity

Section 14 of the TPA, 1882 has fixed the maximum limits for postponing the vesting of interest in the ultimate beneficiary. The maximum period in the course of which the property is remained inalienable is called perpetuity period.

The maximum time limit fixed for postponing the vesting of interest:

Life or Lives of the last prior interest holder/s + Minority of the ultimate beneficiary.

Gestation Period

The fetal development period from the time of conception until birth is called the gestation period. This period usually lasts for 9 months. An unborn child in the mother’s womb during the gestation period is a competent transferee. If the last prior life interest holder expires before the birth of the unborn person then the maximum period for postponing the vesting interest will be –

Life of the last prior interest holder + Period of gestation + Minority of the ultimate beneficiary

If the ultimate beneficiary is already a born person then the period of gestation will not be counted besides the minority of the ultimate beneficiary.

So the maximum possible remoteness of vesting is =

Life of the last prior interest holder + Period of gestation + Minority of the ultimate beneficiary.

Comparison between English Law and Indian/Bangladeshi Law regarding Rule of Perpetuity

The scope of postponing the vesting of property in an ultimate transferee is different in English and Bangladeshi/Indian law.

Under English law the vesting of interest in a property may be postponed up to life or lives of last prior interest holder/s plus the age of 21 years old irrespective of the age of minority of the ultimate beneficiary. The English law permits 21 years at large after life or lives in being. According to English law if vesting of property in a transferee has been postponed beyond 21 years, the transfer shall not be void. Transfer shall operate as if age of 21 years had been replaced for the specified in the instrument, which can be any fixed duration longer than 21 years.

As previously discussed, in India and Bangladesh the law permits only the period of minority after a life or lives in being for postponing the vesting of property in a transferee. Also, the maximum age limit is 18 years.

Exception of Rules Against Perpetuity

1.Public Benefit:  Public benefit is discussed in Section 18 of TPA. This is a protection for rules against perpetuity i.e Section 14 as well as other Sections like 16 and 17.

2.Personal Agreements: This rule applies to only transfers of interest. Agreements that do not create any interest in the property are not affected by this rule.

3.Mortgage: Just like personal agreements, mortgage will not be affected by Section 14 as in mortgage there is no creation of future interest.

4.Perpetual Lease: Perpetual lease also is an exception in Section 14.

5.Pre-emption: In pre-emption, if there is no question of any kind of interest in the propery. Then this rule won’t apply.

6.Land Purchased by Corporation: In case of corporation, this rule won’t apply.

7.Gift Made For Charity: This will also not be affection by Section 14.

8.Properties Settles For Memorable Public Service: This is another exception of this section.

Case Laws Regarding Rule Against Perpetuity

1)Anand Rao Vinayak V Administrator General of Bombay

In this case, a gift was declared void in light of Section 14 because the given clause in that gift was 21 years which is clearly violation of this rule.

2)Abdul Fata Mahomed V Rasamaya

The privy council held that, a gift to an unborn child or generations is forbidden by Muslim law or Mohammedan law except in the case of Waqf.

3)Rambaran V Ram Mohit

The Supreme Court held that, section 14 i.e rule against perpetuity does not apply to personal agreements if the agreement does not create any interest in the property.

Similar Act related to Rule Against Perpetuity

Section 14 of TPA is similar to Section 114 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.


Section 14 of TPA or Transfer of Property Act i.e Rules Against Perpetuity is one of most important topics of Transfer of Property. This section helps circulation of property in society. Otherwise, there won’t be any conformity in the society.

Leave a Comment